Some people think parents are responsible for transporting their children to school. Others think

Some people think parents are responsible for transporting their children to school. Others think it is the government’s responsibility. Discuss both views and give your own opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think parents are responsible for transporting their children to school. Others think

Some people think parents are responsible for transporting their children to school. Others think - mẫu 1

It is common practice in many parts of the world for parents to arrange home-to-school transportation for their children, whether by driving their own cars, getting lifts from friends, or using public transport routes. Some educationalists, however, argue that it should be the government’s responsibility to make coordinated arrangements, which are said to be superior in terms of efficiency and educational values. Is this claim justified?

Some people claim that sending children to and from school, a responsibility traditionally borne by family members, is part of parenting and I can understand their point of view. The most common reason cited is that transport, like food and accommodation, constitutes part of children’s daily necessities, normally organized by their family. This, however, ignores that fact that with the increased number of work hours and the resulting productivity, it might no longer be reasonable to expect the average employee to set aside two hours from their busy schedule for this purpose or cover the expenses for delegating others to do so. Another factor is the perceived flexibility to suit specific needs of individual households. This might be true and hence valuable under some special circumstances, but the benefits for most students, who do not require extra attention or facilities, are minor compared with the time and money saved by joining a commute scheme organized by the authorities.

Others, on the other hand, consider government-led transport programmes to be a more effective alternative. The most popular reason in favor of this centralized approach is increased efficiency. This means coordinated route planning, fewer vehicles on the road and trained personnel to oversee the journey and ensure a safe traveling experience, all of which would not be possible if individual households make their own arrangements. Another benefit is the unique learning opportunity for the schoolers when mixed with a variety of peers. They likely develop a sense of responsibility by performing such routine tasks as checking their seatbelts and looking after their personal belongings, while daily interactions with their bus mates, often from different classes and ages, can raise awareness of cultural diversity and teach them to help others.

Overall, while it is neither reasonable nor practical for many parents to transport their school-aged children to school, government-funded and regulated home-to-school travel is probably a better alternative. If implemented and coordinated effectively, this policy can potentially reduce the burden on busy working parents, cut costs for the educational and transport authorities and ensure a safe and fun schooling experience for students.

Some people think parents are responsible for transporting their children to school. Others think - mẫu 2

Many feel that parents should take their children to school, while others feel this is a governmental responsibility. In my opinion, this is chiefly the duty of governments.

Those who feel parents should be in charge of transportation to school argue this is an important element of family life. Most people have fond memories of their parents driving, walking, or taking public transport with them to school and this is a potential time for bonding. Early in the morning on the way to school children and parents are likely to be at their most energetic. After a long day at school and work, both parties will probably be tired or busy. This therefore means the morning commute is an opportunity to catch up, make plans for the day, and enjoy each other’s company.

Nonetheless, most families rely on government support in this area for a number of reasons. Firstly, many families lack the time to take their children to school in the morning. This is particularly the case if they have more than one child and they attend different schools. A parent living in a rural area, for example, might have to be at work early in the morning and simply does not have the flexible schedule to allow for multiple morning trips. Secondly, most people depend on school buses and consider this a key part of their tax contributions. This is particularly true for less privileged families, who might not have private transportation, or in single parent homes where time is at a premium.

In conclusion, the familial gains of a trip to school in the morning are outweighed by the very practical concerns of average citizens. Governments should continue to ease the burden on parents by providing transportation to and from school.

Some people think parents are responsible for transporting their children to school. Others think - mẫu 3

Transporting children to school is an important issue that is often hotly debated. While some people believe that it should be the government's or school authority's responsibility to provide transportation, others argue that parents should take this responsibility. In this essay, I shall discuss both views and argue that parents should take this responsibility.

Those who argue that it is the government's or school authority's responsibility to transport children to school believe that it is a public service that should be provided for free. They argue that providing transportation would reduce the burden on parents who might not have the means and time to take their children to school. In addition, they argue that it would encourage more children to attend school, especially those who live far away from the school or those with disabilities.

On the other hand, those who believe that parents should be responsible for transporting their children to school argue that it is their duty as parents to ensure their children's safety. They believe that parents are best placed to provide transportation because they know their children's needs and can cater to them. Moreover, some argue that providing transportation services can be expensive for the government, and it may not be feasible for all schools to offer transportation.

In my opinion, while it is the government's or school authority's responsibility to provide a safe environment for children to learn, parents should take responsibility to take their children to and from school. Parents should ensure that their children arrive at school safely and on time while also picking them up in due time to ensure their safety.

In conclusion, the transportation of children to school is an important issue, and the parents of young students are in the best position to carry out this responsibility. While the government and school authorities should provide excellent learning environments in schools, parents should take the responsibility of transporting their children to and from school.

Some people think parents are responsible for transporting their children to school. Others think - mẫu 4

Transporting children to school is a responsibility that can be seen as both the duty of the government and the parents. Different people have different opinions on who should be responsible for transporting children to school. Some argue that it is the government's responsibility to provide transportation for students, while others believe that parents should take on this responsibility. In this essay, we will discuss both views and provide an opinion on the matter.

Those who argue that it is the government's responsibility to transport children to school often point to the fact that public education is funded by taxpayer dollars. As such, they believe that the government should provide transportation for students, especially in areas where public transportation options are limited. Additionally, proponents of this view argue that providing transportation for students can help to ensure equal access to education for all children, regardless of their family's economic circumstances or geographic location.

On the other hand, there are those who believe that parents should be responsible for transporting their children to school. They argue that it is the parents' duty to ensure that their children are able to get to school safely and on time. Additionally, some parents may prefer to have control over their children's transportation to and from school, particularly if they have concerns about the safety and reliability of public transportation options.

In my opinion, both the government and parents have a role to play in ensuring that children are able to get to school. The government should provide transportation options for students, particularly in areas where public transportation is limited. This can help to ensure that all children have equal access to education, regardless of their family's financial circumstances. However, parents also have a responsibility to ensure that their children are able to get to school safely and on time. This may involve providing transportation themselves or arranging for alternative transportation options if public options are not available or reliable.

In conclusion, transportation to school is a shared responsibility between the government and parents. The government should provide transportation options for students, particularly in areas where public transportation is limited, to ensure equal access to education for all children. However, parents also have a responsibility to ensure that their children are able to get to school safely and on time. Ultimately, collaboration between the government and parents is essential to ensure that children are able to access education in a safe and timely manner.

Some people think parents are responsible for transporting their children to school. Others think - mẫu 5

It is contended that driving children to school is parent's duty, which is opposed by those insisting on the supportive role of governments. Although reasonable arguments could be suggested for each standpoint, I believe states outperform parents in taking children to school.

It is safety that renders parents to take their children to school gates, as their company creates a sense of certainty that they can protect their vulnerable offspring from unexpected risks such as kidnapping, accident, and peer temptation. What is also built from the companion is a secure, tighter family bond, seemingly troublesome in many modern households. As an example, accompanied children can have close interactive time, thereby openly confiding their issues to parents.

Benefits from state support in this regard are also worth considering. Legalised intervention might lessen traffic severity. Particularly, when school buses and transport systems are enhanced, fewer parents will use private vehicles to carry their children to school. The reduction gives more space on streets, eliminates chaotic drop-offs and pick-ups, and accordingly eases traffic congestion. A comparison between a bus accommodating up to 30 students and an equivalent number of 30 cars to deliver that number of students well clarifies the mentioned view.

Personally, disciplinary measures bring greater effects than disorganised habits. Far from suspicion of safety, state-run buses can guarantee better security for students thanks to tracking cameras and chip-operated system. These advanced features will offer school age passengers a protected, supervised journey. Also, to claim that family will become closer and secure by such journey is to oversimplify the multifaceted relationship formed not solely by talking. Most importantly due to ever-increasing gridlock, constraining parents to drive their children to school is deemed proactive to address this insurmountable problem instead of resorting to other costly methods.

Because of fallacious safety, governments that can provide safer trips and improve traffic issues should be answerable for trips children take to school.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Many people believe that formal ‘pen and paper’ examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement. Discuss this view and give your own opinion.

• Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

• Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

• Some people view giving presents as an important way to show care to family and friends, others think there are more important things that can be done to show care and appreciation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---