Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences

Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences, so this kind of information should be restricted in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences

Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences - mẫu 1

Today, it is often argued that elaborate descriptions of criminal activities on printed newspapers and social media should be limited because of their numerous adverse effects. Personally, I disagree with this notion and will offer my opinion in the following essay.

Granted, there are several drawbacks of displaying detailed criminal information in the media. Firstly, the descriptions of brutal and serious offences could promote a strong sense of insecurity and anxiety among the general public in society. Consequently, many people may feel disinclined to socialize with others around or help strangers in need, especially those they think are potentially suspicious, which may render the community less close-knit and more cold-hearted. Secondly, elaborate criminal descriptions could adversely affect offenders to a great extent even after successful rehabilitation programs. This is because the human mind is capable of remembering detailed information of criminal acts people abhor, which possibly prompts them to still harshly discriminate against ex-offenders.

Nevertheless, I would argue that elaborately provided criminal descriptions are of huge benefit to the tightening of social security. On being publicly shown to the masses, these depictions can inform citizens of meticulous or intricate forms of illegal acts. Therefore, people will be encouraged to take more precautions or equip themselves with necessary tools to avoid such undesirable situations. For instance, thanks to the detailed reports of widespread crimes over the past few years, some Vietnamese households have already begun to install surveillance cameras and alarm bells which can timely alert these families to cases of thefts. Without these careful criminal descriptions, they might have been unable to take such appropriate measures to prevent serious offences.

In conclusion, despite the view that restrictions on showing detailed criminal descriptions in the media should be imposed, it is my firm conviction that this type of information would prove valuable to social security in the long term.

Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences - mẫu 2

There is a school of thought that believes the media content involving meticulous description of crime could have negative impacts and so it should be limited. From my point of view. I agree that this type of content has more drawbacks than advantages to general viewers.

There are some valid reasons why some accept the presence of criminal content in the media. One proposition is that this type of information could be educational regarding one's security and safety. News concerning crimes or true crime documentaries could educate everyone about criminals' minds and the typical ways a crime is committed, which could help people to be more alert if they ever encounter such dangerous situations. However. these kinds of information could be delivered via a more standardized and textual way rather than gruesome images which could possibly be traumatizing to some.

I would opine that media censorship on meticulous criminal accounts is necessary for the well-being and security of society. Detailed descriptions of unlawful conduct via mass media could unintentionally encourage law-breaking by giving demonstrations or instructions to potential law offenders on how to commit a crime. In many mass shooting cases in the U.S., it is common that the suspects have high exposure to uncensored violent and criminal content. Another justification is this type of information may be triggering to the public. Fear and anxiety could easily be spread within the society when citizens may consider their community unsafe as too many cruel acts are reported.

All things considered, while some kind of criminal content is essential for educational purposes, a meticulous description of law-breaking acts could pose potential hazards to our safety. Thus, it is reasonable that this type of content should be subject to censorship and be closely regulated.

Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences - mẫu 3

The advent of diverse multimedia platforms has facilitated the widespread dissemination of detailed information about crimes, including graphic depictions and images, which are readily available to audiences. However, this trend has ignited debates regarding the potential hazards of such content, leading to calls for restrictions. I firmly concur that the drawbacks of this type of content outweigh the benefits.

Access to comprehensive portrayals of crime can indeed offer valuable insights into criminal behaviour and spur individuals to take preventive measures. For example, revealing a serial killer's modus operandi could assist law enforcement in suspect identification and prevention of further incidents, while also enabling the public to adopt protective measures. However, it's crucial to consider the potential psychological ramifications for the public. Instead of graphic depictions, standardised and written methods may serve as a more effective and less distressing approach for raising awareness.

There are, however, profound drawbacks associated with the dissemination of graphic crime content that cannot be overlooked. One of the primary concerns is the potential to induce unnecessary fear and anxiety among the audience. Graphic details of crimes, when widely circulated, can lead to a sense of panic and apprehension in communities, regardless of the low probability of similar crimes occurring in their vicinity. This can result in increased stress levels, decreased sense of safety, and harmful vigilantism. Furthermore, the sensationalisation or over-representation of certain crimes in media can reinforce negative stereotypes about specific groups of people, such as racial or ethnic minorities. This can lead to serious repercussions for these groups, including increased discrimination, harassment, and even violence. For instance, media coverage that disproportionately emphasises the race or ethnicity of a criminal can fuel prejudice and discrimination against members of that group.

In conclusion, while it is critical for the public to stay informed about crime trends and safety measures, the distribution of detailed crime information should be handled responsibly. It should consider potential psychological impacts on viewers and avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes. In this way, we can balance the need for public safety information with the need to maintain societal harmony and individual psychological well-being.

Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences - mẫu 4

The detailed depiction of criminal activities in newspapers and on television has sparked a debate regarding its potential negative influences. I totally agree that such information should be restricted in the media due to its detrimental effects on viewers, particularly vulnerable youths, and the way it aids potential criminals.

One major reason to support the restriction of detailed criminal descriptions is that they can encourage viewers, especially impressionable youngsters, to violate the law. Teenagers, driven by curiosity and the desire to make an impression, might replicate crimes they see detailed in the media. Their vulnerable mentality and lack of experience make them susceptible to such influences. For example, in 2017, a 13-year-old boy in Ohio was arrested for attempting to create a homemade bomb after following a detailed tutorial he found online. This incident underscores how exposure to explicit crime-related content can lead to juvenile delinquency, which can become rampant if left unchecked.

Another reason is that detailed descriptions of crimes can serve as a manual for would-be criminals, complicating efforts by law enforcement to combat crime efficiently. Although the intention behind crime reporting is often to warn the public and educate them on avoiding similar situations, it can have the opposite effect. For instance, during the late 1970s, the "Son of Sam" murders in New York City received extensive media coverage. The detailed accounts of David Berkowitz's crimes potentially inspired copycat killings and hindered the police's ability to gather information and apprehend him quickly. This example highlights the unintended consequences of detailed crime reporting, which can inadvertently assist criminals in honing their methods.

In conclusion, the restriction of detailed criminal descriptions in the media is necessary to prevent the encouragement of illegal activities among young viewers and to hinder the education of potential criminals.

Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences - mẫu 5

The increased degree of freedom in media reports has allowed exposure of crime cases to come forth in a detailed manner, which certainly arouses a great deal of concern. In light of this, some people believe there should be restrictions on such information. From my perspective, I agree that censorship should be imposed on the descriptions of crime.

There are several reasons why the focus of newspapers and television on high-profile crimes should be more carefully regulated. The group most affected by the news media's coverage of violence and victimization is crime victims. This is because media coverage that is sometimes viewed as insensitive, voyeuristic, and uncaring can largely violate victims' privacy and inflict their emotional and psychological suffering. Not only that, but the general public also seldom benefits from this exposure to crime details. In fact, these descriptions can not only cause discomfort but also arouse apprehension about the impacts on young people. Besides, it is likely that potential offenders would be instigated and incited to commit crimes, since they might regard detailed media coverage as a form of guidance.

It is undeniable that the coverage of crime cases can be helpful and, in some cases, even healing. Some would also suggest that the media have the obligation to keep the public well informed about trends in crime. Indeed, the media play a significant role in public safety by keeping citizens apprised of essential information on criminal affairs, such as new patterns of fraud, ways to assist victims and measures to prevent crime. However, the extent to which the media can cover about these cases should be censored carefully by avoiding excessively detailed descriptions, so that they can accurately cover crime stories with the least amount of trauma to the victim and negative repercussions on the public.

In conclusion, although newspapers and television need to raise the public awareness of key information on crime cases, I contend that restrictions should be imposed on excessive descriptions of details, in order to mitigate the detrimental consequences.

Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences - mẫu 6

It is argued that reporting crimes in detail in printed newspapers and on television is detrimental; therefore, it should be limited. I completely agree with this notion since it gives rise to criminal acts and people’s anxiety.

The first reason for my view that crimes should not be reported meticulously is because it encourages viewers to violate the laws. More specifically, numerous teenagers tend to follow or replicate infractions presented with detailed procedures, methods and tools mainly because they have great curiosity, or they want to make a grand impression by proving that they can be better than the person who committed the original crime. For instance, Shinochiro Azima, a 14-year-old student in Japan killed two students in 1997 by cutting off their heads after watching a documentary about an American criminal, the Zodiac Killer, who performed the same acts. As he was being interrogated, he admitted that he imitated this horrible act since he wanted to impress other people. Consequently, this may pose a threat to social stability due to growing crime rates.

Another justification for why I oppose the detailed presentation of crimes via the mass media is that members of the public’s anxiety can be triggered. This is because they may consider their community unsafe and then hesitate to connect with others as too many cruel acts are reported in the media. They would likely feel afraid of being a victim of a potential crime and constantly experience a sense of insecurity. As a result, it could lead to a loose-knit community where people are not willing to support those in need.

In conclusion, I strongly oppose the idea of presenting detailed crime reports in newspapers and television because it provokes more individuals to be driven to crime and arouses people’s apprehension. It is advisable that the details of the crimes should be completely banned to minimise its adverse impacts on viewers.

Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences - mẫu 7

The restriction of legal violation scenes shown via media channels should be introduced by the related authorities due to their detrimental impacts. From my perspective, I would express my strong opposition to that suggestion as broadcasting criminal cases through multimedia sites is beneficial in terms of educating citizens and exercising caution in dealing with serious offenses.

On the one hand, the detailed description of crimes in newspapers and on TV would be disadvantageous due to the possibility that people would commit the same criminal acts and display anxiety toward the unsafe society. Regarding the former drawback, showing the wrongdoings of criminals publicly on media networks provides individuals with a clear understanding of how the infringement was conducted, from which they may learn and follow. As a consequence, there are high chances that those people, especially youngsters, would become potential offenders in the future. Not to mention that by televising a myriad of violation occurrences, mental health problems would experience a drastic increase since citizens are prone to develop anxiety toward an unsecured society.

On the other hand, broadcasting more crime scenes on social media websites can be considered a means of education and caution for people. Chief among these is that broadcasting more violations of crimes in combination with their severe punishment plays a pivotal role in eradicating the intention of future offenders. Therefore, the increasing rate of the number of to-be-culprits would be significantly reduced. In addition, by exemplifying in detail the procedure of a breach, individuals would be more well-aware of the feasibility of a criminal case. Thus, they would have a tendency to prepare for approaches to avoid being victims of wrongdoings.

In conclusion, although the display of criminal scenes should be limited due to their potential impact on increasing lawbreakers' and citizens' concerns, I am of the opinion that cases of violation of law should be shown on different media sites to educate and inform people about the risk of those offenses.

Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences - mẫu 8

Some people argue that detailed criminal descriptions in newspapers and on TV have negative impacts and should be restricted. In my opinion, restricting the media from reporting on crime in detail is not the solution, and may actually have negative consequences.

Firstly, the media has a responsibility to report on events accurately and objectively, and this includes crimes. Restricting information on criminal activity may lead to misinformation, censorship, and a lack of transparency in the justice system. The media can also play an important role in holding law enforcement agencies accountable by reporting on cases that may have been mishandled or neglected. For example, some countries have implemented regulations that limit the amount of information surrounding criminal cases, including the names and photographs of suspects and victims. As a result, the public has been left with little information about ongoing criminal cases, leading to confusion and rumors about what is happening.

Secondly, the public has a right to be informed about criminal activity in their community. Access to accurate and detailed information can help citizens take necessary precautions to protect themselves and their property. It can also encourage public awareness and involvement in crime prevention efforts. For instance, in a neighborhood with a high incidence of burglaries, law enforcement may provide residents with information on how to secure their homes and property, as well as signs to look out for that may indicate suspicious activity.

In conclusion, while some may argue that detailed criminal descriptions in the media have negative impacts, I believe that the benefits of accurate and transparent reporting on crime far outweigh any potential negative consequences.

Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences - mẫu 9

Whenever we turn on TV or read a newspaper, more often than not we can read a lengthy description of atrocious crime, which has become a so-called feature of modern media. I, as one of the common readers, advocate the proposal that such reports should be strictly controlled, if not abolished.

Alarmingly, those criminal descriptions wield adverse influence on the audience, especially fragile youngsters. Due to vulnerable mentality and lack of ample experience, upon contacting violent programmes, those kids are tempted to follow suit, thus breaking the law and such juvenile delinquencies are too often to be ignored. If this trend is out of control, then more teenagers will fall victim to those evil reports.

Moreover, numerous would-be criminals can learn skills of committing crimes from similar cases, also the police find it more formidable to crack down on crimes efficiently. Although the original purpose of crime description is to warn people against offenses and teach them valuable lessons, the fact is that there, indeed, exists a discrepancy between what is desired and what is achieved. The latest research reveals that some habitual lawbreakers have access to criminal skills and even the police's detective methods from TV programmes and newspaper stories about crimes. By contrast, if we restrict strictly the programmes of tackling criminal cases, the ways employed by the police to combat crimes win be kept as the top secret, and it is out of the question to be disclosed to the public, especially those potential offenders.

Granted, criminal content, which is not a usual experience for common, can enhance. the TV rating substantially. Satisfying people's curiosity and adding varieties to choices, those programmes can always attract a larger audience. As for me, however, the overwhelming detriments have overshadowed whatever benefits.

Overall, no matter what excuse media can find for detailed criminal description, there should be a strict regulation to limit such broadcasting. Government and relevant organisations should co-operate fully, guaranteeing healthier circumstances.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some countries have introduced laws to limit working hours for employees. Why are these laws introduced? Do you think they are a positive or negative development?

• Many people put their personal information online (address, telephone number, and so on) for purposes such as signing up for social networks or online banking. Is this a positive or negative development?

• In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products, such as medicines and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---